Electrode and Gap Design
Enviado por Christian9119 • 1 de Octubre de 2014 • 242 Palabras (1 Páginas) • 162 Visitas
Electrode and Gap Design
When selecting the spark plug “nose” configuration, the simple rule to
remember is: The more the spark plug is exposed to the air/fuel
mixture, the easier it is to initiate combustion. Many specialized plugs
have been developed for high-end race cars, but for most dual-purpose
vehicles the choice typically boils down to either regular-gap
(conventional) or projected-nose styles.
The regular-gap plug is the traditional configuration factory-installed on
many classic musclecars. For modern high-performance work, it should
only be used if there isn’t enough clearance for a projected-nose plug.
The latter style “projects” the spark further into the chamber than a
standard plug, and will nearly always offer improved performance if
there is sufficient valve and piston clearance, although many nitrous
oxide users prefer to stay away from them because of excessive heat
buildup in the tip that can cause detonation.
Projected plugs initiate the flame-front closer to the center of the
combustion chamber, which has an effect similar to advancing the
timing. This lets the total ignition advance be reduced, decreasing the
chances of detonation while providing superior throttle response. A
projected plug’s longer core nose provides a hotter plug at low speed to
help prevent fouling. As engine speed increases, the incoming air/fuel
mixture flows across the core nose tip, providing charge cooling that
effectively reduces the heat range for increased top-end detonation
resistance. Today many race cars also used projected-nose plugs, albeit
in highly modified form from the “civilian” versions—the ground
electrodes are often cut back to help improve the flame kernel and
reduce the voltage amount needed to fire the plug.
...