ClubEnsayos.com - Ensayos de Calidad, Tareas y Monografias
Buscar

Euthanasia Murder Or Saviour


Enviado por   •  24 de Abril de 2014  •  374 Palabras (2 Páginas)  •  244 Visitas

Página 1 de 2

Euthanasia: Murder or savior.

The word euthanasia is another term for “good death”. It is any action intended TO end the life of a human being on the grounds that HIS/HER life is -no longer- worth living. It also means a gentle and easy death, but IT is a premature ending OF life, BUT IS IT the best OPTION? If you asked someone who is involved in caring for the terminally ill, they would probably disagree, but there are some people in this world who are fighting to make assisted suicide legal.

Euthanasia is a controversial TOPIC, not only because there are many different moral dilemmas associated with it, BUT ALSO THE FACT OF ENDING A LIFE IN ANY WAY CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS. At the extreme ends of disagreement, LAW EXPERTS say euthanasia is a “good or merciful death”. OppoSITE OPINIONS STATE THAT euthanasiA is “a fancy word for murder”.

The pro-euthanasia arguments ARE BASED ON CASES OF PATIENTS WHO suffering UNBEAREABLE PAIN at the HIGHEST POINT of THEIR DISEASES MAKING existence intolerable. When life becomes unbearable, quick death can be the answer. If ANY PERSON FEELS so ill that they cannot tolerate the pain they have a right to die to an escape from THAT torment. AS long as the right to die means not prolonging the life by undesirable treatment, it may be classified as rational suicide…SORRY MALEJA…I DON’T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU MEAN HERE.

Patients, who are suffering from terminal disease, become hopeless and disappointed to such an extent that they JUST want to end their lives rather than continue UNDER the same pathetic circumstances. Every person has a right to live a dignified life and the plight of the person causes him to live a tortuous life, then he/SHE should be allowed to end such tortuous existence.

On the contrary, the opponents of euthanasia emphasiZe that health-care providers are obligated to prohibit killing as euthanasia. That is why society has no right to kill them and thereby deny them the chance of future recovery.

WE can conclude that euthanasia should be allowed. A terminally ill patient, who has no chance of recovery WHO HAS TO endure THROUGH MOMENTS OF unbearable pain for the remaining years of his life, should be allowed to die.

...

Descargar como (para miembros actualizados) txt (2 Kb)
Leer 1 página más »
Disponible sólo en Clubensayos.com