Political pluralism in Mexico

Political pluralism is very healthy in a democracy. The choice between several country projects strengthens citizen participation and gives substance to any electoral process.It is something that you should always support

In our specific case, it is bad. Arguably, in other cases it's good because they help to preserve the plurality etc, but it only takes some research, always allied with some of the greats. In conclusion, they are satellite parties that make only filling, but do not represent real plurality and new ideas, but yes, represent an expense.

One of the great controversies in the country, raises every six years, sometimes three and sometimes every year. We have a very bad policy in the country, where the only word that matters is power. Max Webber would say it's an occasional politician, who are those who have nothing to do with politics but who are fighting for political office are those who "eat the bone." If we focus the view of Webber would say that in Mexico, there are few warlords, who is the one who has the vocation of politician, who is a born leader, he comes autoritas him alone, and that really care about the people.

Here in Mexico after 75 years of "tyranny" of the PRI, now we have a multiparty system, which in some places really are reduced to three parties: PRI, PAN and PRD; but here in the north fortunately does not exist or no one is struck by the PRD. We know that usually the PAN is "right" conservative, the PRI is center-left, but in the last election were not see any trend, and the PRD is "left", I say it is of no side because not progress and not allowed to proceed. In other countries like the United States, work with both parties: Democrat (left), R (right) everyone knows in America that put Democrats in debate: abortion, euthanasia, homosexuals, while Republicans It may interest more foreign policy, wars. In Spain the Popular Party led by Mariano Rajoy, right and led by Zapatero but also good to be Spain a country that its different communities, provinces allege independence of the country's Socialist Party and often win home games as the PVN in the Basque Country and Navarra.

The fact is that Mexico has great parties and home match, but do not have a common denominator always allocates the PRD, PRI and PAN say if "white", the PRD say "black". They simply will not work, because the PRI is becoming just restructured, and can not go for absolute power and instead PAN is more conservative, some accuse him of far-right, he wants the state to open. But none has something in common, society totally separate, they manipulate people so in Spain the left does not feel much nor in England because there are certain things that pull even and that change things as relative.

I agree that we can not return to the "Policy handpick" who no longer need a Juárez or PRI but we have to agree either to reduce the parties

...